Don’t Feed The Troll

Zen and the art of surfing

Sam
3 min readFeb 2, 2020

In 2006 I was hired by Cycling Plus to administrate their troubled forum. They had a troll infestation. I set things aright, and even had the opportunity to reinstate Simon L2, who had been banned; apparently the owners didn’t see much difference between him and said trolls.

I didn’t stay long. I was too busy keeping my own forum safe from underbridge dwellers. Later, kaboom!, but it was {mostly} nice while it lasted.

I’ve been thinking about trolls thanks to this old thread on CycleChat, which the earth yielded up during my recent prospecting. OMG, I thought on reading my own replies,

Also, was that guy actually calling me a troll? Either it’s obvious or it’s not. Doesn’t really matter, except this too set a chain reaction going in my brain until I finally concluded: I am a troll. What else do you call someone with a history of riling people up on forums (and obliterating them on occasion)?

Wait just a minute! came my frontal lobe/front bumper to my defence.

brains on the brain

A troll delights in posting to raise hackles: that’s always been precisely the opposite of my intent. It seemed a trial was in order. I hired Saul Goodman as my lawyer.

For prosecuting attorney I’ve pulled Evilchuffy, aka Chuffy, beloved OP of CycleChat’s Beer thread, out of retirement. Talk about a blast from the past.

Evilchuffy: If it please the court, I call as my first witness Flying_Monkey. He can’t be here today given his importance to the Canadian economy, but I submit his sworn testimony that the defendant is “a sophisticated troll” by dint of the fact that he gets under certain people’s skin in a literate if not literal way.

Judge: The court recognises Flying_Monkey as an expert in absentia.

Saul Goodman: Objection! Who has time to read all these links?

Judge: Sustained.

Evilchuffy: The prosecution rests.

Judge: I’m ready to render a verdict.

Saul Goodman: Wait a minute! I’m not done yet.

Judge: Very well. Any last words?

Saul Goodman: No evidence of hostility has been presented. Ever. This trial is a travesty of justice. My client has always tolerated dullards until they practically throw themselves under his wheels.

Judge: That’s not helping your case.

Saul Goodman: Mercy. Also, be sure to catch me on Netflix later this month.

[All rise]

Judge: The vedict is guilty, of not fitting in. I sentence you to hard labour of fitting square pegs into round holes, or vice versa, depending on what’s in stock. Oh, and damnatio memoriae.

tough but fair
Unlisted

--

--

Sam
Sam

No responses yet